promoting the unwanted, redheaded stepchild that is individual liberty

The ‘war on cyber terrorism’

In liberty and rights on February 27, 2010 at 11:04 pm

Until now, the Internet has been a mostly unregulated, user-created technology; giving rise to an unprecedented expansion of free speech. However, that may soon be changing.

According to a Washington Post article on Wednesday, the federal government is looking for ways to regulate both federal and private industry in an effort to increase cyber security.

Senators Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) are drafting legislation to protect the nation from a massive cyber security attack. Rockefeller described such an attack as an “enormous threat” and justified the controversial legislation. 

“Too much is at stake for us to pretend that today’s outdated cybersecurity policies are up to the task of protecting our nation and economic infrastructure,” Rockefeller said. “We have to do better and that means it will take a level of coordination and sophistication to outmatch our adversaries.”

According to an article in The Hill, the power to regulate and, if need be, control the Internet would be vested in one man, the President of the United States:

“The president would then have the ability to initiate those network contingency plans to ensure key federal or private services did not go offline during a cyberattack of unprecedented scope”

The threat posed by cyber attacks is real. Google recently fell victim to an attack it claims originated in China. Even the Joplin Globe blogs, including Redheaded Politics, were shut down in January 2009 by hackers opposed to U.S. and Israeli policy in Gaza.

But the threat of giving the executive branch sweeping powers of regulation and “protection” in case of a national emergency are far more unsettling. If the federal government wishes to increase the security of its own networks let it do so. The ramifications of it controlling and monitoring the private sector, aka me and you, could be dreadful.

Watch Wednesday’s Senate Commerce Committee cybersecurity hearing.

  1. Jessica,

    Both you concerns about protecting cyber security expressed herein and your concerns over intrusive seaches before boarding aircraft by federal mandate are valid and I share your concern as a matter of policy.

    BUT, I do not object to MY internet activity to be viewed by government as I do not object to MY body being examined to keep bombs off of airplanes. Therein lies the dilema. You seem to suggest to keep the government “out of it” at all costs. I am willing to sacrifice MY liberty to a degree to achieve a worthy goal of internet and aircraft safety.

    I don’t think either one of us has a clue how to achieve the goals AND meet the requirements of full liberty, sans government interference to which we both aspire. As I said, a dilema, and as is usually the case, one size does not fit all.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: